Tower Bank Investment Management
2006
in Review/2007 Hopes and Fears
![]()
This paper reviews our forecasts for 2006 and presents
our hopes and fears for 2007. Please note the date above. We have had to move
forward the date of this to accommodate our statement mailing protocol.
For another year, our forecasting success has been a
mixed bag, but with more good calls than bad. We thought the economy would grow
slower than the consensus economist forecast of 3.4%. We said the Federal Funds
Target Rate (FFTR) would go to at least 4.75% and we ÒwouldnÕt be surprised to
see... 5.00%.Ó We thought the dollar would decline against major foreign
currencies. Regarding bonds, we said that we would see the Òpeak in long-term
interest rates in 2006.Ó We thought stocks would have a better second half than
a first half and would produce a total return of 6.60%. We continued to
emphasize the energy and materials sectors, and we expected healthcare stocks
to perform well. We advised staying away from consumer exposure.
Although we will not know until well into 2007, it
appears that the economy will have grown in the neighborhood of 2.0 –
2.5% in 2006. The Federal Funds Target Rate is presently 5.25%. The dollar
declined significantly on a trade-weighted basis in 2006. The 10-year treasury
note peaked at 5.25% in June and is presently at 4.62%. The two consumer stock
sectors, which we liked least of all, returned an average of 13.8%. The sectors
we liked best did well in 2006. The energy sector was up 25.4%; materials,
15.5%. Both beat the S & P 500, which returned (thus far) 15.1%. That leads
us to our calls that were not so good.
We underestimated, by more
than half, the strength of U.S. equities in 2006 (6.6% v. 15.1%), although we called
the halves of the year correctly: weak first half, strong second half. Healthcare
stocks were the worst performing of the groups, returning a mere 4.7%.
Equity indexes around the
globe performed well in 2006, and returns to U.S. investors were helped by the
weakness in the dollar. The returns below include reinvested dividends.
|
Foreign
Indexes |
Local |
U.S. $ |
Domestic Indexes
|
|
|
Brazil
Bovespa |
29.0% |
40.1% |
S
& P 500 |
13.2% |
|
CAC
40 (France) |
15.7% |
28.4% |
Dow
Jones Industrial Avg. |
15.3% |
|
China
(Shanghai Composite) |
101.9% |
108.4% |
NASDAQ
Composite |
9.1% |
|
DAX
(Germany) |
20.2% |
33.4% |
S
& P 400 (Mid-cap) |
11.1% |
|
FTSE
100 (U.K.) |
10.2% |
25.5% |
Russell
2000 (Small-cap) |
18.4% |
|
Hang
Seng (Hong Kong) |
29.9% |
29.5% |
|
|
|
Mexico
Bolsa |
42.0% |
38.7% |
|
|
|
NIKKEI
225 (Japan) |
6.2% |
5.4% |
|
|
Bond market returns—judging by the results of
intermediate-term bond market index funds—were positive at 4.6%.
It is difficult to enter 2007 and not be concerned that this is the third longest run in a cyclical bull market without at least a 10% correction. It is healthy for a market to have periods of advance interrupted by periodic declines. Markets that advance uninterrupted defer the inevitable.
We presently enjoy
near-record-low capital gains tax rates, and dividends are taxed at 15%. A
democratic congress is likely to lean toward tax increases and has already
discussed rolling back Òthe Bush tax cuts.Ó Increases in these rates will make
investors reluctant to reallocate capital and will reduce the appeal of
dividend-paying stocks. As to which party is in control, the change in control
in congress bodes well for equities. Under Democrat control, stocks have
returned 6.4% since 1901. Under Republican control, stocks have returned 3.6%.
This
could comprise a long list of worries, but let us limit it to three. First,
Iran appears to have big ambitions in the Mideast, which could cause the price
of oil to rise—perhaps dramatically. Second, a number of terrorism plans
have been squelched, but more are in the works. Third, we have not heard much
lately about bird flu and other strains of influenza, but according to many
smart people, a pandemic is likely.
4. Popularity
of foreign investments leads to their underperformance
Again,
in 2006, investments in foreign stock funds were many times the amounted
invested in U.S. stock funds. The perils of investing in the hottest mutual
fund sectors are well documented. Fundamentally, foreign investments continue
to make sense—and we still recommend them—but we highlighted our
concern about them in our March 31, 2006, outlook. We remain concerned.
We
are hopeful that growth in the economy will slow enough to bring inflation
under control, yet not slow enough to trigger a recession. Presently, this
appears to be the case. The wild card, in our opinion, remains the extent of
the slowdown in housing and its effects on consumers. On the other hand, corporate
balance sheets are in good shape. This does not mean the next six months will
be trouble free, but it should bode well for equity performance.
A
cut in the Federal Funds Target Rate
The
Federal Reserve always sounds hawkish at the end of rate hiking cycles, and
investors have been quick to expect rate cuts in 2007. We do think, though,
that the slowing economy and accompanying tempered inflation expectations will
allow the Federal Reserve to make the first of a series of rate cuts. We make
no guess as to when this might come. In recent experience, however, the Fed has
been quick to switch from hawkish to dovish on rates. Presently, the futures
markets are expecting two quarter-point rate cuts in 2007.
Lower
interest rates
Longer-term
rates are not done declining. Subdued inflation expectations and a friendly Fed
should help insure that. This will lead to lower mortgage rates, cushioning the
blow from the housing slowdown. It can also help support higher
price-to-earnings multiples, leading to . . .
Another
decent year for stocks
Valuations
on stocks are reasonable, albeit not cheap. The two factors above should enable
stocks to have a decent year in 2007. Sentiment toward stocks changes as
investorsÕ moods swing between fearless and fearful. Presently,
the pendulum is decidedly in the fearless camp. It may be that some of 2007Õs
return has been moved forward into 2006. The fundamental conditions, however,
are in place for a good year. To the extent that the majority of investors
already recognize that reduces future returns for stocks.
As always, feel free to call or e-mail us with your feedback to our year-end recap.